Posts Tagged ‘Rights’

Militant Feminism - The Perversion of the Movement

Wednesday, January 14th, 2009

A good liberal wouldn’t write this blog. But I’m not a good liberal. Conservatives (AKA, dumbasses), I am not siding with you either. I have found a happy medium on this subject. Here I’ve gone explaining myself without even telling you what I’m talking about. As you can guess from the blog title today’s topic  is Militant Feminism (sorry guys, I know Wednesday is all about songwriting but I had to get this off my chest. Maybe I’ll write a songwriting blog in the morning. Its 2AM right now).

I met a feminist. Feminism is great. Feminism is most certainly a good thing. But this feminist has taken it too far, and has taken it to heart. She turns everything you say into a slight against women.

Feminism is right to question gender stereotypes. I don’t think a feminist is crazy if she breaks gender stereotypes by not shaving her arm pits or her mustache. And let me make it clear, I am not making fun of feminism here. These things, albeit slightly gross, are part of feminism. I think women shouldn’t have to wear pink and other bright colors. They can wear flannel and work in steel mills and be CEOs and chop wood, play sports and go topless at the beach just like men. That last one does not fit into every feminists definition of feminism but its certainly one I would encourage.

Feminists are all about not being victimized. They hate the idea of women being victims and having to rely on men to rescue them as they do in so many movies, TV shows, and even fairy tales. See: Shrek, Rapunzel, aspects of Sarah Jessica Parker’s character on Sex in the City with Big, and the list goes on.

The feminist I met has taken these tenets to such an extreme that she has gone in a circle and ended up on the wrong side of the issue. I work with this woman. She is a bitch. Plain and simple. Yeah, I know, its not sensitive to feminists to call a woman a bitch. I guess its like calling a black person a nigger. But hey, guys are dicks and assholes, so why can’t a woman be a bitch? I think being called a female dog is better than being labelled as an ugly penis or an anus. But I digress.

This woman (who is constantly PMSing [LOL I keep on saying things that are so antifeminists, but I swear I'm all for it]) seems to end up as a victim every five minutes. While working in the kitchen at my job, people come through with heavy pieces of fryers and ovens that are very hot. Whenever a guy comes through at least one person always says “hot stuff, comin’ through!” and no one takes notice. When a woman comes through the same way the same phrase is spoken by at least one person. When Mrs. Feminist comes through and someone says that, she retorts “It figures you would say that to a female”. That makes me cringe. Fuck you, lady. Get over yourself. No one thinks she’s really “hot stuff”. In fact she is just the opposite. She’s hideous. And your a fuck if you try to say otherwise. If someone is ugly then they’re ugly - and if someone is REALLY ugly then they’re hideous. But back to this woman. She took that little quip so personally. The fact that she took it so personally doesn’t bother me as much the fact that when she asserts her feminism with these quips she says them in a manner that screams “I am educated and in a higher social class than you. You are uneducated white trash that is beneath me”. Someone so much better than the rest of us should be out there running the world, not sitting in a fast food joint unclogging a greasy drain. She needs to get over herself. I’m a smart guy, who has a bright future ahead of me. Once I finish with school I’ll be out there working a well paying job that I enjoy (people in IT tech and other programming type jobs, especially analysts, make pretty good money from what I’ve read). Even as it stands now I’m pretty accomplished. In fact I was just looking at my ACT scores today because I needed them to register for classes and I scored higher than 93% of those who took the test when I did - and thats nationwide. I went to Loyola ( and will be going back). I don’t say this because I want to make sure you know how awesome I am. I want to stress that I could go around with an attitude like hers but I don’t. When I talk to people I always treat them with respect so long as I get it in return. I see people my own age in there who have ended up working for this fast foot place as a career. I don’t think any less of them. These are people like me and everyone’s situation is different. We can’t all be brain surgeons. So why does this woman think she’s so great?

I saw her using a squeegee the wrong way and she was obviously having trouble. I went over to help her. I showed her  a better, more efficient way to get the water on the floor into the drain. Instead of being thankful she took it as an insult to women everywhere. She created a victim of herself. She took what I did as me saying “women can’t squeegee floors right, let a real man do it”. I wasn’t implying a women couldn’t do that job. I was certainly letting her know that SHE, as in this particular person regardless of gender, seemed to suck at what she was doing. I would have done the same to anyone. In fact I ended up correcting lots of people’s mistakes, mostly men’s by the way, because it just happens to be my job. But I’m not an ass about it. I just say something like “Hey, check this out. I’ll show you a faster/better/easier/whatever way to do this”.

Does feminism make you better than others? No. But I think this is a fad in her life. Kind of like how there’s those goth kids in high schools all over America. She wants to be a feminist and in her mind she is in an exclusive club that makes her better than anyone else. She has taken it upon herself to educate us imbeciles on how to treat feminists like her better than everyone else.

She has twisted feminism in the way some Evangelicals have twisted Christianity. When it comes to the other girls (I say girls because many are under 18) she doesn’t look out for them like a good feminist. She stares them down. She has an obvious distaste for them. Because they aren’t feminists like her they are lesser life forms. But rather than take it upon herself to talk to them, befriend them, and then lead them to gender equality in our workplace, she just stares down her nose at them because she wants to be the special one. She believes she is someone with special knowledge. The others can’t know what she knows because then she wouldn’t be better than the others. This is total perversion of feminism. Feminism should be brought to the masses. It should not be forced on them by any means. But the least she could do is let them know what she does. Explain what feminism is all about and tell them by what means feminists hope to gain gender equality. 

But she is not a feminist. No. No way. No how. If a real feminist saw her they would be disgusted. She is just a woman who was never popular in high school, has poor social interaction skills, and isn’t very attractive. She perverts feminism in an attempt to make herself feel good about herself. She’s a snotty bitch.

Feminism is a movement meant to advance the cause of gender equality. A good feminist talks to people with respect and educates them on how to be respected as an equal with men. It is definitely not about being better than other people because you are a part of a special club in your mind with secret knowledge only to be imparted upon the truly worthy. Feminism is a cause I support. Being a total bitch in the name of feminism is something I don’t support.

Fuck you, crazy bitch! How do you like that? I called you a bitch!

On the Topic of Politics Everywhere

Tuesday, January 13th, 2009

Homos, homos, everywhere. And a lot of people hate them. I have an unhealthy obsession with defending the honor of gay people. I’m sure they don’t need me to speak on their behalf. In fact how could any straight person speak on their behalf. That would be like the NCAA being run by a white guy. But anyway, its political theater Tuesday so I have a few things to talk about today, not just gay people. So no comprehensive post on one subject today. Instead I’ll be touching on a lot of subjects.

Last night I caught a bit of Bullshit O’Reilly’s show. He was talking “covering” Bush’s final press conference that happened yesterday. You’ll be surprised at what pissed me off. I didn’t get mad at the way he usually talks over anyone who doesn’t agree with him and gives more airtime to guests he agrees with even if he has two guests debating each other at once. I didn’t get mad at the usual propaganda/indoctrination consisting of labeling anyone against the war unpatriotic or America haters. I also didn’t get mad when he referred to sound economic advice as “a form of socialism” adding that the Democrats are Marxists. What I took issue with was a comment he made concerning Bush’s press conference. He talked about how Bush admitted making mistakes while implying that Bush shouldn’t have apologized because he couldn’t foresee the current trouble we’re in. Thats totally retarded. Its his job to anticipate problems. Furthermore Billo reinforced the idea that Bush inherited a recession. Bull. Shit. He created a recession. And if he wants to talk about things he inherited how about talking about the budget surplus he inherited and promptly squandered.

And what’s this crap about him keeping us safe? He boasts about not having been attacked since 9/11. That is nothing to be proud of. First off, he had plenty of time to act on what occurred that day. He had the intelligence reports warning him about this in August of 2001. I mean, what the hell? Was 9/11 a gimme? As far as I know, you don’t get a do-over when things like that happen.

But all this isn’t what made me mad while watching Bullshit O’Reilly. I come to expect these sort of lies (and that’s what they are, lies, there is no other word for them. I will not use euphemisms on this one because they don’t apply here) from his show. The kicker was when Bill O’Reilly declared that he has had many disagreements with George Bush. I almost dies laughing. That’s a tactic that Republicans use when they cross the line and start sounding way too fanatical. Every prominent Republican has used that line (especially on shows like O’Reilly’s and conservative talk radio) in order to avoid looking like an extreme fanatic that worships a doctrine instead of letting reason and logic guide them as well as to make them seem objective. I dare anyone to find a clip or transcript or anything proving that Hannity, the Golfer, O’Reilly, or any other prominent conservative talker has disagreed with Bush on anything. I don’t want to see instances where they think a certain measure needs to be taken further (there are plenty of those but they still support the idea in principal in those cases). If you can find me any instance of this you can write my next blog and it can be about any moronic conservative idea you want. I won’t even edit it. And it will stay here forever.

On the to gay rights. I hate people who say people choose to be gay. To those people I ask why? What do they gain? Why would someone choose to be gay with people like you in the world? These people point to pseudoscientific studies that prove their point and then call any substantive scientific evidence to the contrary pseudoscience just I call their science the same thing.

There has been research that shows gay men’s pituitary gland is formed differently than straight men’s. There is also a study that is very odd. The research examined people’s ring fingers in comparison to their index finger. Those people with ring fingers longer than their index finger got lots of testosterone in the womb. How much is dependent upon how much longer the ring finger is in comparison to the index finger. Those with longer ring fingers tend to be more aggressive. It has been shown that women with longer ring fingers are more likely to be gay than those with index fingers the same length or longer than their ring fingers. The study isn’t as conclusive with men. But it makes sense that if a lot of testosterone in the womb enlarges the ring finger then women with more testosterone in them will be more likely to partner with women. How’s that for scientific evidence Nancy Goldfuck. You can look the study up yourself. I heard about it on the radio. They said where you can find it but I forgot.

Now on to Sarah Palin. Her daughter is an unwed mother and high school drop out and her boyfriend is the same. This woman raised a child that did this and she wants to be president? First learn to manage your family, Suzy Homemaker. This woman needs to shut up. She blames everyone else for how bad the campaign… no, excuse me, she blames everyone for how bad she was in interviews and throughout the campaign including that prank call from Nicolas Sarcozy (spelling?) and never takes responsibility herself. By doing this she is making herself look even worse. She wants the presidency for all the wrong reasons. She is in love with herself. She could care less about the country. She just wants people to adore her. Having her as president is a scary prospect. And its not because shes a Republican. The woman didn’t even know what the job of the Vice President is. She couldn’t name a book, newspaper or magazine until weeks later on the campaign trail when she made a remark about a newspaper article about Obama’s relationship with Bill Eyeres (spelling?). Funny thing about that is the newspaper article she referenced was over two years old. Was she catching up or something? How the hell did she get a newspaper that was over two years old?

The woman is an idiot. I’m gonna totally gonna get hate comments for what I’m about to say next but I can’t stop myself… I can see where the gene for her baby’s condition came from.

Nancy Goldfarb Thinks (about homosexuality a little too much for a straight person)

Monday, December 22nd, 2008

If you look in my links section you’ll see a link to a blog by a woman by the name of Nancy Goldfarb. She has views that are exactly opposite of my own. But thats no reason not to read her blog. Dissenting points of view are welcome in my world. I probably won’t agree most of the time but I certainly am interested in opposing views.

I commented on one of her articles saying that homosexuality is prevalent in 5% of all populations - animal and human. This is her response.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with homosexuality. It hurts no one. Gays want the same rights every other minority has been afforded and now there is a group of people (mostly Christians unfortunately) who want to take rights away from them. The nation’s constitution as well as every state’s constitution has only afforded people rights. Never until prop 8 has a constitution actually taken rights away from a protected group. And this is being done in the name of religion and this is being done for a variety of reasons. To defend marriage. So that children won’t be confused. Because someone cherry picked passages from the bible that they interpret to mean homosexuality is… bad for lack of a better word.

If a gay couple’s marriage somehow harms your marriage then you have another problem altogether. This marriage defense is total bull. The definition of marriage has changed many times over the course of human history. It used to be acceptable to buy your wife. It was common at one time to marry many wives. Marriage itself didn’t come about until middle ages. And these days marriage is not a religious practice. Its part of the laws of the state. You can have a priest marry you live on TV during the super-bowl with millions of witnesses and it wouldn’t count. You have to file the correct papers with the state. So since this actually a legal argument its clear that gays should be afforded the right to marry. But the anti-gay movement wants to define the argument in religious terms because they get more traction that way. Don’t be fooled. As long as you have to go into city hall to get married its a legal matter. Now as far as I know the law applies to those who are gay, straight, black, or white. If gays can’t get married under the law like anyone else then no one should be able to get married. These people who rail against gay marriage are just like those in the past who were against blacks and whites (or even asians, latinos, or whomever) getting married. Its straight up prejudice and there’s no excuse for it. The religious argument against gay marriage is crap as well. Your beliefs do no give you the right to persecute a group of people. Face it. Gays cannot and will not be “cured”. They are all around you. They work with you, ride the subway with you, they are customers, employees, brothers, sisters, musicians, actors, newspaper writers, entrepreneurs. They are everywhere and you probably interact with one or more homosexuals every day without knowing.

If one were to think rationally they would come to the conclusion that homosexuality is in no way threatening to anyone or any institution. I think that those that are so passionate about taking away homosexuals’ right to marry should find out what being gay is all about. These people are fed stereotypes and then form negative opinions of homosexuality. Let me clear a few things up. I’m not gay, but I lived with a gay roommate in college and did some research.

Homosexuals are no more promiscuous as heterosexuals
Gays are not trying to indoctrinate your children
Homos generally don’t go around doing drugs and sharing needles
etc..

I don’t know what else to say except that these are people just like you and me. You wouldn’t know they were gay unless you asked.

This hatred is irrational. This idea of extending every right to every group then extend all right except the right to marry to homosexuals is irrational. Take the time to find out the truth behind the stereotypes.

I see this hate speech almost every day. Its sad. I feel so bad that people go around hating other people because they don’t understand them or simply don’t want to understand them.